The technology industry is experiencing a leadership crisis that's burning out middle managers at unprecedented rates. As companies implement harsh return-to-office mandates, conduct widespread layoffs, and demand unwavering loyalty from leadership, the people caught in the middle are paying a steep personal price.
The Perfect Storm of Burnout
Middle managers in tech are facing what one industry observer calls the perfect recipe for burnout - high expectations combined with minimal power to meet them. These leaders find themselves acting as human shields, protecting their teams from unrealistic corporate demands while publicly supporting policies they privately disagree with. The emotional toll is severe, with many reporting complete loss of enthusiasm for work they once loved.
The situation has created a generation of managers who spend their days performing what amounts to corporate theater. They smile and nod in executive meetings, then retreat to private conversations with their teams to acknowledge the obvious problems everyone can see. This constant code-switching between public compliance and private honesty is exhausting even the most dedicated leaders.
When Trust Becomes a Casualty
The breakdown of trust between companies and employees has fundamentally changed the management role. Many organizations are demanding that workers return to offices that literally don't have enough desks for everyone, while simultaneously implementing rigid 9-to-5 schedules that haven't been seen in tech for decades. These policies feel particularly jarring in an industry that built its culture on flexibility and trust.
The wild part is they weren't even chasing money, efficiency, etc. They were chasing some kind of weird internal management/org chart tribalism with zero value-add.
The disconnect between stated company values and actual policies has left managers in an impossible position. They're expected to enthusiastically sell decisions that make no practical sense, while maintaining credibility with teams who can clearly see the contradictions.
The Hidden Cost of Chaotic Good Leadership
Industry experts are now advocating for what they call chaotic good leadership - publicly supporting company policies while privately acknowledging their flaws to team members. This approach might preserve team morale in the short term, but it's taking a devastating toll on the managers themselves. Many report feeling like they're living double lives, constantly calculating what they can say to whom and when.
The strategy of being honest in private while toeing the company line in public has become a survival mechanism. Managers find themselves making small rebellions - overlooking minor policy violations, providing flexibility where officially none exists, and creating pockets of sanity within increasingly rigid corporate structures.
The Broader Economic Reality
Much of this shift stems from the end of the zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) era that allowed tech companies to prioritize growth over efficiency for more than a decade. As funding became more expensive and investors demanded profitability, companies pivoted to what many see as unnecessarily harsh cost-cutting measures. The pendulum has swung from take care of employees and they'll take care of the business to a more traditional do your job or else mentality.
The change has been particularly jarring for an industry that prided itself on being different from traditional corporate America. Many tech workers had never experienced the kind of rigid hierarchies and punitive policies that are now becoming commonplace.
 |
|---|
| A solitary pier at sunset, reflecting the isolation and contemplation experienced by tech middle managers amidst shifting corporate landscapes |
A Crisis of Leadership Philosophy
The current approach to management in tech represents a fundamental philosophical crisis. Companies are asking their middle managers to be simultaneously authentic and deceptive, supportive and compliant, innovative and obedient. This contradiction is unsustainable and is driving experienced leaders out of the industry entirely.
The long-term consequences extend beyond individual burnout. Companies are losing institutional knowledge and experienced mentors just when they need them most. The managers who remain are often too exhausted to provide the kind of visionary leadership that built the tech industry's reputation for innovation.
As the industry grapples with these challenges, one thing is clear: the current model of middle management is broken. Whether companies will recognize this reality and make meaningful changes, or continue to burn through their leadership talent, remains to be seen. For now, the managers caught in the middle continue to pay the price for their organizations' failure to align values with actions.
Reference: How to Be a Leader When the Vibes Are Off