Meta Admits to Scraping Australian Facebook Data Since 2007 for AI Training

BigGo Editorial Team
Meta Admits to Scraping Australian Facebook Data Since 2007 for AI Training

In a startling revelation, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has admitted to collecting and using data from Australian Facebook users' public posts dating back to 2007 to train its artificial intelligence models. This admission came during an Australian Parliamentary committee hearing, raising significant concerns about privacy and data protection in the country.

Widespread Data Collection Without Consent

Meta's global privacy director, Melinda Claybaugh, confirmed that the company has been scraping data from public posts on Facebook and Instagram made by Australian users for over 15 years. This includes text, photos, and other content shared publicly on these platforms. The practice affects virtually all Australian users who haven't explicitly set their posts to private.

Lack of Opt-Out Option for Australians

Unlike users in the European Union, who are protected by strict GDPR laws and have the option to opt out of data scraping, Australian users were not provided with this choice. Meta admitted that it only offers such protections in regions with stringent privacy regulations, highlighting a concerning disparity in user rights across different countries.

Implications for Minors and Children's Data

While Meta claims it doesn't scrape data from accounts belonging to users under 18, the company couldn't confirm whether it avoids collecting images of minors shared on adult accounts. This raises additional concerns about the protection of children's data and privacy.

Regulatory Landscape and Future Implications

The revelation has sparked calls for stronger privacy laws in Australia. Senator David Shoebridge criticized the government's inaction, stating that the lack of robust privacy legislation has allowed companies like Meta to exploit user data, including that of children.

Meta's AI Ambitions and Data Practices

This incident sheds light on the vast amounts of data required to train AI models and the ethical concerns surrounding such practices. It also highlights the growing tension between tech companies' AI ambitions and user privacy rights.

As the story unfolds, it's likely to prompt discussions about data protection, AI ethics, and the need for global standards in privacy regulations. The Australian government may now face pressure to implement stricter laws to protect its citizens' data from unchecked corporate use.