The Reality Check on AI Engineering: Why "Anyone Can Do It" Isn't Quite True

BigGo Editorial Team
The Reality Check on AI Engineering: Why "Anyone Can Do It" Isn't Quite True

The tech community has responded strongly to recent claims that anyone can be an AI engineer, highlighting a growing divide between simplified AI development tools and the complex reality of production AI systems. While new tools and frameworks are making AI more accessible, industry veterans and practitioners are raising important concerns about the oversimplification of AI engineering as a discipline.

The Complexity Behind AI Engineering

Despite the availability of tools that make basic AI implementation possible with minimal coding, professional AI engineering involves far more than connecting APIs and writing prompts. Production AI systems require deep technical knowledge, rigorous testing, and careful consideration of failure modes. Financial sector practitioners note that real-world AI applications, such as fraud detection models, demand extremely high reliability with specific performance metrics like four 9's uptime, 100ms latency, with 50,000 calls an hour.

Key Requirements for Production AI Systems:

  • Reliability: Four 9's uptime (99.99%)
  • Performance: 100ms latency
  • Scale: 50,000 calls per hour
  • Precision: 50% precision rate
  • Recall: 80% recall rate

The Skills Gap Reality

The discussion reveals a significant distinction between building prototype AI applications and developing production-ready systems. While anyone with basic programming knowledge can potentially create an AI demo, professional AI engineering requires extensive knowledge of systems architecture, performance optimization, and risk management. Many commenters emphasize that understanding fundamental concepts like servers, DNS, and HTTP protocols remains crucial, regardless of AI tools' accessibility.

The Open Source Factor

While open source models are making AI more accessible, they also present their own challenges. The community notes that running models locally provides better data privacy and control, but requires significant technical expertise to implement effectively. Some developers are already leveraging open source models for specific use cases, such as processing personal image collections and creating searchable databases, demonstrating both the potential and complexity of working with these tools.

If you can't easily initiate a git repo and whip something up and send it to me in half an hour you won't be a good fit. It means you aren't fluent and lack in experience.

The Market Reality

Contrary to the notion of lowered barriers, experienced AI engineers at major tech companies can command total compensation packages ranging from $700,000 to $1 million annually. This compensation level reflects the substantial expertise required, including staying current with research developments and implementing practical applications effectively.

AI Engineer Compensation at Big Tech:

  • Total Compensation Range: $700,000 - $1,000,000 annually
  • Required Skills: Research expertise, implementation experience, systems architecture knowledge

Conclusion

While the democratization of AI tools is a positive development, the community's response suggests that becoming a professional AI engineer requires much more than basic familiarity with current tools. True AI engineering demands a comprehensive understanding of software systems, rigorous testing practices, and the ability to handle complex production requirements. The distinction between using AI tools and being an AI engineer remains significant, despite the increasing accessibility of basic AI implementation.

Source Citations: We can all be AI engineers - and we can do it with open source models